Future of Soft Power: 2026 National Capability Ratings

Future of Soft Power: 2026 National Capability Ratings
QUICK TAKE 路 AI Summary
  • 馃嚜馃嚜 Estonia, 馃嚫馃嚞 Singapore and 馃嚚馃嚟 Switzerland share first position, each reaching the Capability Frontier (Tier 1) across all three Soft Capability domains: Human Capital, Information & Influence and Governance & Integrity.
  • 馃嚦馃嚧 Norway and 馃嚫馃嚜 Sweden share fourth position, each holding Tier 1 in Information & Influence and Governance & Integrity, with Tier 2 in Human Capital.
  • 馃嚛馃嚢 Denmark, 馃嚝馃嚠 Finland and 馃嚢馃嚪 South Korea share sixth position, each holding Tier 1 in one Soft Capability domain and Tier 2 in the remaining two.

This article presents a domain-based assessment of soft power, evaluated across multiple foundational pillars such as culture, diplomacy, education, information and influence, and people-to-people connectivity. Rather than relying on composite indices, countries are assessed using Pareto tiering, which preserves the structure and balance of soft-power systems without collapsing them into a single score. Countries are placed into domain-specific tiers, and relative ordering is derived using a competition-style ranking that reflects the concentration of higher-tier capabilities rather than marginal differences.

The core analytical device is a single matrix chart showing countries as rows, soft-power domains as columns, tier placement in each cell, and rank applied only where profiles differ. This structure reveals not only who leads in soft power, but how influence is constructed鈥攅xposing asymmetry, structural ceilings, and regional variation. Applied globally and across regional groupings, the framework demonstrates that soft-power leadership is scarce, while meaningful differentiation persists well below the frontier.

Figure X. Top 20 Nations: 2026 Soft Capability Ratings

Soft Capability Hard Capability Soft Capability Econ Capability Frontiers
# Nation CT SI NS HC II GI FS PI TI T1 T2 T3
1馃嚜馃嚜 EstoniaT5T3T5T1T1T1T5T2T1411
1馃嚫馃嚞 SingaporeT3T1T3T1T1T1T1T1T17-2
1馃嚚馃嚟 SwitzerlandT2T2T6T1T1T1T1T1T162-
4馃嚦馃嚧 NorwayT3T1T5T2T1T1T2T4T3322
4馃嚫馃嚜 SwedenT3T2T5T2T1T1T2T1T2341
6馃嚛馃嚢 DenmarkT4T2T6T2T2T1T3T2T2151
6馃嚝馃嚠 FinlandT4T2T6T2T2T1T4T2T3141
6馃嚢馃嚪 South KoreaT2T1T3T2T1T2T3T1T2342
9馃嚦馃嚤 NetherlandsT1T1T4T3T1T2T2T2T2341
10馃嚡馃嚨 JapanT2T1T3T4T1T3T2T1T2332
11馃嚚馃嚦 ChinaT1T1T2T3T1T7T2T1T2431
11馃嚭馃嚫 United StatesT1T1T1T3T1T7T1T1T17-1
13馃嚛馃嚜 GermanyT1T1T4T4T1T4T2T2T3321
13馃嚞馃嚙 United KingdomT2T3T3T4T1T4T2T4T4122
15馃嚝馃嚪 FranceT1T1T2T4T1T5T2T3T3322
16馃嚘馃嚜 United Arab EmiratesT4T1T4T4T2T2T2T3T2141
17馃嚠馃嚤 IsraelT2T1T2T3T2T3T4T1T3233
18馃嚘馃嚭 AustraliaT3T3T4T4T2T3T3T4T4-14
19馃嚦馃嚳 New ZealandT5T4T6T5T3T2T4T5T5-11
20馃嚠馃嚜 IrelandT4T3T9T5T2T4T5T3T4-12

Contents

  • Introduction
  • National Soft Power Assessments
  • Regional Soft Power Profiles
  • National Case Studies
  • Scenarios and Sensitivity Analysis
  • Data and Definitions

Introduction

Soft power is assessed across multiple irreducible domains, including:

  • Cultural Reach and Creative Influence
  • Diplomatic Networks and Global Engagement
  • Education, Research, and Talent Attraction
  • Information, Media, and Narrative Influence
  • People-to-People Exchange and Global Communities

Each domain is evaluated independently. No aggregation, weighting, or averaging is applied across domains.

Rather than producing a single index, each country is assigned a tier within each soft-power domain based on Pareto dominance. This preserves the multidimensional nature of influence and avoids allowing excellence in one area鈥攕uch as cultural exports or media reach鈥攖o mask weakness in others, such as diplomacy or educational pull.

Overall rank is derived, not calculated.

Countries are ordered by the concentration of higher-tier placements across domains, beginning with Tier 1, then Tier 2, then Tier 3. Countries with identical domain-tier profiles share the same rank, and competition ranking is applied (e.g. 1, 1, 3, 4). Rank never determines tier placement, and tiers are not scores鈥攖hey are structural categories that describe how national soft power is built and sustained.

Regional Ratings

East Asia and Pacific

East Asia and the Pacific is home to some of the world's most influential soft power actors, with a cultural and institutional reach that has expanded dramatically over recent decades. From Japan's post-war investment in education and technological innovation to South Korea's global cultural exports and Australia's world-class university system, the region has developed formidable soft capability assets. China's vast human capital base and growing information infrastructure add further weight, while smaller states such as Singapore and New Zealand have built outsized reputations for governance quality and institutional transparency. The region's soft power trajectory reflects both deep historical traditions of scholarship and administration and a more recent, deliberate effort to project influence through knowledge, media and institutional credibility.

The data confirm the region's strength in global soft capability rankings. Six East Asian and Pacific nations appear in the global top 20 for soft rank, with Singapore, New Zealand and Australia each achieving T1 status across multiple soft domains. Japan and South Korea perform strongly in human capital and information influence, while several Pacific Island states and less developed Southeast Asian economies occupy the lower tiers, reflecting persistent gaps in education systems, media reach and governance frameworks. The region's soft power landscape is thus sharply bifurcated: a cluster of globally leading nations at the top, and a long tail of states where institutional and human capital development remains a work in progress.


Figure X. East Asia and the Pacific: 2026 Soft Capability Ratings

Soft Capability Hard Capability Soft Capability Econ Capability Frontiers
R#G#Nation CTSINS HCIIGI FSPITI T1T2T3
11馃嚫馃嚞 SingaporeT3T1T3T1T1T1T1T1T17-2
26馃嚢馃嚪 South KoreaT2T1T3T2T1T2T3T1T2342
310馃嚡馃嚨 JapanT2T1T3T4T1T3T2T1T2332
411馃嚚馃嚦 ChinaT1T1T2T3T1T7T2T1T2431
518馃嚘馃嚭 AustraliaT3T3T4T4T2T3T3T4T4-14
619馃嚦馃嚳 New ZealandT5T4T6T5T3T2T4T5T5-11
729馃嚬馃嚰 TaiwanT4T4T5T4T4T4T5T3T3--2
830馃嚟馃嚢 Hong KongT5T2T8T4T4T5T4T6T5-1-
953馃嚥馃嚲 MalaysiaT7T4T7T7T6T9T5T6T7---
1062馃嚠馃嚛 IndonesiaT7T7T7T11T6T10T6T11T8---
1163馃嚨馃嚟 PhilippinesT11T9T8T12T6T13T9T15T12---
1270馃嚮馃嚦 VietnamT8T6T7T9T7T10T7T11T8---
1379馃嚙馃嚦 BruneiT13T5T10T8T9T8T9T17T15---
1481馃嚬馃嚟 ThailandT7T5T8T8T8T12T6T10T8---
1596馃嚥馃嚨 Northern Mariana IslandsT6T7T5T10T9T9T9T9T11---
1697馃嚞馃嚭 GuamT7T6T5T11T9T9T13T17T16---
17100馃嚬馃嚮 TuvaluT7T10T6T13T11T9T6T6T8---
18104馃嚥馃嚧 MacaoT10T6T7T10T11T10T11T11T14---
19121馃嚨馃嚝 French PolynesiaT15T15T10T18T14T11T9T10T12---
20126馃嚦馃嚚 New CaledoniaT12T7T8T12T14T12T13T16T15---
21135馃嚰馃嚫 SamoaT20T15T9T20T13T15T11T12T12---
22140馃嚝馃嚡 FijiT17T13T11T21T13T17T15T21T18---
23144馃嚥馃嚦 MongoliaT14T11T10T17T14T15T12T17T15---
24145馃嚘馃嚫 American SamoaT10T11T7T18T15T14T11T8T12---
25153馃嚦馃嚪 NauruT13T14T8T19T14T17T9T10T12---
26156馃嚬馃嚧 TongaT18T17T11T22T14T19T14T15T15---
27170馃嚢馃嚟 CambodiaT16T13T11T21T15T19T14T21T15---
28179馃嚮馃嚭 VanuatuT21T19T11T22T16T19T13T14T14---
29189馃嚨馃嚰 PalauT22T21T12T23T17T20T19T21T19---
30193馃嚬馃嚤 Timor-LesteT21T17T12T24T18T20T16T21T18---
31194馃嚤馃嚘 LaosT17T13T13T24T18T21T19T25T18---
32196馃嚫馃嚙 Solomon IslandsT15T16T14T26T18T21T21T28T24---
33201馃嚢馃嚠 KiribatiT22T21T12T25T18T23T18T18T18---
33201馃嚥馃嚟 Marshall IslandsT22T22T12T25T18T23T15T21T20---
35203馃嚨馃嚞 Papua New GuineaT18T13T12T24T19T21T18T23T19---
36209馃嚢馃嚨 North KoreaT11T12T7T27T19T27T22T27T25---
37211馃嚥馃嚥 MyanmarT15T14T8T26T20T24T20T24T21---
38212馃嚝馃嚥 MicronesiaT23T17T14T28T20T25T20T26T23---

Europe and Central Asia

Europe and Central Asia encompasses the world's deepest concentration of soft power, anchored by centuries of institutional development, educational excellence and cultural production. Western and Northern European states have long set global standards in governance transparency, press freedom, higher education and diplomatic influence, while the European Union itself functions as a normative soft power actor of considerable weight. The region also includes the post-Soviet states of Central Asia and the Caucasus, where soft capability trajectories have diverged sharply since independence, creating one of the widest internal ranges of any World Bank region.

The rankings reflect this breadth. European nations dominate the upper reaches of the global soft capability table, with the Nordic states, Switzerland, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom all achieving T1 across multiple soft domains. Germany, France and several smaller Western European states sit close behind. By contrast, the Central Asian republics and several states in the Western Balkans and Eastern Europe occupy considerably lower positions, with governance integrity and information influence emerging as the domains where the gap between the region's leaders and laggards is most pronounced. The sheer depth of soft power talent at the top, however, makes Europe and Central Asia the strongest region in aggregate soft capability.

Figure X. Europe and Central Asia: 2026 Soft Capability Ratings

Soft Capability Hard Capability Soft Capability Econ Capability Frontiers
R#G#Nation CTSINS HCIIGI FSPITI T1T2T3
11馃嚜馃嚜 EstoniaT5T3T5T1T1T1T5T2T1411
11馃嚚馃嚟 SwitzerlandT2T2T6T1T1T1T1T1T162-
34馃嚦馃嚧 NorwayT3T1T5T2T1T1T2T4T3322
34馃嚫馃嚜 SwedenT3T2T5T2T1T1T2T1T2341
56馃嚛馃嚢 DenmarkT4T2T6T2T2T1T3T2T2151
56馃嚝馃嚠 FinlandT4T2T6T2T2T1T4T2T3141
79馃嚦馃嚤 NetherlandsT1T1T4T3T1T2T2T2T2341
813馃嚛馃嚜 GermanyT1T1T4T4T1T4T2T2T3321
813馃嚞馃嚙 United KingdomT2T3T3T4T1T4T2T4T4122
1015馃嚝馃嚪 FranceT1T1T2T4T1T5T2T3T3322
1120馃嚠馃嚜 IrelandT4T3T9T5T2T4T5T3T4-12
1221馃嚤馃嚭 LuxembourgT5T3T7T3T3T3T5T5T5--4
1322馃嚘馃嚬 AustriaT3T3T7T3T3T4T5T4T4--4
1424馃嚠馃嚫 IcelandT6T3T9T4T3T4T8T6T7--2
1526馃嚤馃嚬 LithuaniaT6T4T6T6T3T5T6T5T7--1
1526馃嚨馃嚬 PortugalT5T4T6T6T3T5T6T5T6--1
1728馃嚜馃嚫 SpainT4T3T4T6T3T6T3T5T5--3
1831馃嚙馃嚜 BelgiumT3T3T5T5T4T5T4T3T4--3
1831馃嚤馃嚠 LiechtensteinT7T4T10T4T5T5T8T7T9---
2034馃嚚馃嚳 CzechiaT5T4T6T6T4T7T6T5T5---
2135馃嚠馃嚬 ItalyT3T4T3T7T4T7T6T6T5--2
2236馃嚨馃嚤 PolandT5T4T4T7T4T8T5T5T6---
2339馃嚭馃嚘 UkraineT7T7T5T13T4T13T12T14T13---
2440馃嚫馃嚠 SloveniaT6T4T7T6T5T6T6T5T5---
2541馃嚤馃嚮 LatviaT8T5T7T7T5T6T7T6T8---
2643馃嚥馃嚬 MaltaT10T5T10T7T5T9T8T8T8---
2744馃嚟馃嚪 CroatiaT7T5T7T8T5T8T7T9T7---
2845馃嚞馃嚪 GreeceT6T5T5T9T5T8T7T9T7---
2947馃嚟馃嚭 HungaryT6T4T7T8T5T10T6T7T7---
3050馃嚥馃嚚 MonacoT8T5T8T6T6T7T8T10T12---
3151馃嚚馃嚲 CyprusT9T6T9T7T6T8T9T11T9---
3253馃嚫馃嚢 SlovakiaT7T4T8T7T6T9T7T8T7---
3359馃嚪馃嚧 RomaniaT6T5T5T9T6T9T6T8T8---
3460馃嚪馃嚭 RussiaT4T5T3T9T6T11T10T9T11--1
3460馃嚬馃嚪 T眉rkiyeT5T5T5T9T6T11T7T8T9---
3665馃嚞馃嚞 Channel IslandsT10T7T11T9T7T7T7T8T10---
3766馃嚘馃嚛 AndorraT12T7T10T8T7T9T11T17T16---
3882馃嚫馃嚥 San MarinoT11T6T8T10T8T9T11T14T14---
3984馃嚪馃嚫 SerbiaT9T7T7T9T8T14T8T12T10---
4085馃嚢馃嚳 KazakhstanT9T6T7T10T8T11T7T12T10---
4190馃嚘馃嚳 AzerbaijanT11T5T6T11T8T11T7T13T8---
4293馃嚘馃嚥 ArmeniaT9T10T8T12T8T14T12T6T12---
4397馃嚝馃嚧 Faroe IslandsT6T7T5T9T9T11T8T9T11---
4499馃嚙馃嚞 BulgariaT8T6T6T10T9T11T8T10T9---
45104馃嚞馃嚜 GeorgiaT12T8T6T11T10T10T8T8T9---
46106馃嚥馃嚜 MontenegroT13T11T8T10T12T10T8T6T7---
47107馃嚠馃嚥 Isle of ManT9T9T6T12T10T11T7T8T9---
48112馃嚥馃嚢 North MacedoniaT12T11T9T15T11T12T11T14T12---
49114馃嚥馃嚛 MoldovaT14T12T6T13T11T13T9T9T12---
50122馃嚙馃嚲 BelarusT9T8T6T11T14T19T16T15T15---
51127馃嚭馃嚳 UzbekistanT11T8T8T15T12T14T10T14T12---
52134馃嚘馃嚤 AlbaniaT13T12T10T18T13T15T12T18T14---
53148馃嚱馃嚢 KosovoT12T15T13T22T14T16T15T22T17---
54159馃嚞馃嚤 GreenlandT12T13T11T20T16T15T13T17T16---
55164馃嚙馃嚘 Bosnia & HerzegovinaT13T12T11T19T15T18T15T20T16---
56169馃嚢馃嚞 KyrgyzstanT15T14T10T22T15T18T16T22T17---
57184馃嚬馃嚥 TurkmenistanT15T9T10T25T16T23T18T23T20---
58192馃嚬馃嚡 TajikistanT16T15T10T25T17T22T19T25T21---

Latin America and Caribbean

Latin America and the Caribbean has a distinctive soft power profile shaped by its rich cultural traditions, widespread educational expansion and a complex, often turbulent governance history. The region's cultural influence, from literature and music to sport and media, has long exceeded what its economic weight alone might suggest. Several Latin American states have built credible democratic institutions and invested significantly in public education, though the region as a whole continues to grapple with uneven governance quality and institutional trust deficits that constrain its soft capability potential.

The soft capability rankings place the region's leaders in the upper-middle tiers globally rather than at the frontier. Chile, Uruguay and Costa Rica emerge as the regional standouts, with relatively strong performances in governance integrity and human capital that distinguish them from their neighbours. The Caribbean microstates show mixed results, with some achieving respectable information influence scores but struggling in human capital depth, while the larger economies of Brazil, Mexico and Argentina sit further down than their global prominence might suggest, reflecting persistent challenges in translating cultural and demographic assets into top-tier institutional and educational outcomes. No nation in the region achieves T1 in any soft domain, underscoring the distance that remains to the global frontier.

Figure X. Latin America and Caribbean: 2026 Soft Capability Ratings

Soft Capability Hard Capability Soft Capability Econ Capability Frontiers
R#G#Nation CTSINS HCIIGI FSPITI T1T2T3
133馃嚭馃嚲 UruguayT9T5T9T6T4T6T9T10T9---
237馃嚥馃嚱 MexicoT7T5T8T10T4T9T6T9T7---
342馃嚚馃嚤 ChileT6T4T6T7T5T7T5T6T6---
449馃嚡馃嚥 JamaicaT13T8T11T14T5T11T11T16T13---
551馃嚚馃嚪 Costa RicaT10T6T8T7T6T8T7T7T8---
657馃嚨馃嚪 Puerto RicoT8T7T7T10T6T8T7T7T8---
770馃嚙馃嚙 BarbadosT14T7T11T9T7T10T12T17T15---
873馃嚚馃嚧 ColombiaT10T7T7T10T7T11T7T8T9---
976馃嚬馃嚚 Turks and Caicos IslandsT7T8T5T11T7T12T7T7T7---
1080馃嚢馃嚲 Cayman IslandsT11T7T11T10T8T8T10T18T14---
1185馃嚘馃嚰 ArubaT15T8T12T11T8T10T13T21T17---
1185馃嚙馃嚪 BrazilT6T6T6T10T8T11T7T9T10---
1388馃嚨馃嚘 PanamaT10T6T8T13T8T10T10T14T9---
1490馃嚘馃嚪 ArgentinaT7T8T7T11T8T11T12T13T12---
1592馃嚥馃嚝 Saint MartinT6T7T6T12T8T13T9T11T11---
1695馃嚛馃嚧 Dominican Rep.T12T8T9T16T8T14T12T16T13---
17102馃嚚馃嚭 CubaT6T8T8T9T13T17T19T22T17---
18108馃嚨馃嚜 PeruT11T7T6T13T10T12T8T14T10---
19109馃嚮馃嚠 US Virgin IslandsT13T14T8T14T13T10T8T7T10---
20110馃嚙馃嚫 BahamasT14T13T10T19T11T11T12T16T15---
21115馃嚦馃嚠 NicaraguaT6T9T7T13T11T16T14T14T14---
22116馃嚮馃嚚 St Vincent & GrenadinesT16T16T8T18T13T11T8T7T10---
23117馃嚚馃嚰 Cura莽aoT14T12T9T14T11T14T8T10T11---
24118馃嚞馃嚛 GrenadaT10T10T7T14T11T16T10T10T12---
25125馃嚬馃嚬 Trinidad & TobagoT12T6T8T12T12T12T11T10T11---
26129馃嚜馃嚚 EcuadorT12T10T8T15T12T15T11T16T13---
27137馃嚤馃嚚 St LuciaT18T15T9T17T13T16T10T8T9---
28141馃嚫馃嚮 El SalvadorT15T13T9T20T13T18T15T18T15---
29145馃嚫馃嚪 SurinameT15T14T8T18T14T15T11T12T13---
30151馃嚢馃嚦 St Kitts & NevisT12T12T7T17T14T18T13T16T15---
31154馃嚞馃嚬 GuatemalaT14T12T10T21T14T18T16T19T15---
32156馃嚘馃嚞 Antigua & BarbudaT19T16T11T22T14T19T15T20T18---
33161馃嚙馃嚧 BoliviaT15T11T11T20T15T17T15T21T19---
34162馃嚛馃嚥 DominicaT20T16T12T21T15T17T11T18T14---
34162馃嚞馃嚲 GuyanaT16T12T11T21T15T17T14T22T15---
36171馃嚙馃嚳 BelizeT19T15T10T23T15T19T18T22T19---
37172馃嚟馃嚦 HondurasT15T12T10T20T15T20T16T18T15---
38174馃嚮馃嚜 VenezuelaT14T12T8T25T15T24T18T23T21---
39175馃嚨馃嚲 ParaguayT15T11T11T20T16T17T15T21T17---
40177馃嚫馃嚱 Sint MaartenT17T15T10T21T16T18T15T21T18---
41182馃嚟馃嚬 HaitiT21T19T11T24T16T21T15T13T15---


Middle East and North Africa

The Middle East and North Africa occupies a complex position in the global soft power landscape. The region's historical contributions to scholarship, science and governance are among the oldest in the world, yet contemporary soft capability is shaped by a more uneven picture of institutional development, media environments and educational outcomes. The Gulf states have invested heavily in higher education infrastructure, cultural institutions and media platforms in recent decades, while several North African and Levantine states possess deep human capital traditions constrained by governance challenges and conflict legacies.

The rankings reflect both the region's ambitions and its constraints. The United Arab Emirates and Israel lead the region in soft capability, each drawing on distinct strengths: Israel in human capital and information influence, the UAE in institutional modernisation and governance reform. Qatar and Saudi Arabia have made notable investments in soft power projection, though their overall tier placements suggest these efforts have not yet translated into frontier-level outcomes across all three soft domains. At the lower end, conflict-affected states such as Syria and Yemen rank among the weakest globally, dragging the regional average down and illustrating how political instability can erode soft capability assets that took generations to build.

Figure X. Middle East and North Africa: 2026 Soft Capability Ratings

Soft Capability Hard Capability Soft Capability Econ Capability Frontiers
R#G#Nation CTSINS HCIIGI FSPITI T1T2T3
116馃嚘馃嚜 United Arab EmiratesT4T1T4T4T2T2T2T3T2141
217馃嚠馃嚤 IsraelT2T1T2T3T2T3T4T1T3233
324馃嚩馃嚘 QatarT5T2T6T4T3T4T4T7T6-11
437馃嚥馃嚘 MoroccoT10T5T6T10T4T9T6T7T6---
545馃嚫馃嚘 Saudi ArabiaT5T4T5T8T5T9T3T6T7--1
663馃嚜馃嚞 EgyptT9T6T6T12T6T13T7T13T11---
767馃嚙馃嚟 BahrainT9T4T7T7T9T9T6T7T9---
767馃嚧馃嚥 OmanT9T4T7T9T7T9T7T13T10---
973馃嚡馃嚧 JordanT11T6T8T10T7T11T11T15T13---
1083馃嚢馃嚰 KuwaitT9T3T8T9T8T11T6T20T15--1
11113馃嚬馃嚦 TunisiaT10T9T9T12T11T17T13T14T13---
12124馃嚠馃嚪 IranT6T8T4T15T11T19T16T13T15---
13130馃嚛馃嚳 AlgeriaT10T7T6T18T12T16T14T19T13---
14143馃嚤馃嚙 LebanonT14T14T10T21T13T21T20T22T20---
15150馃嚨馃嚫 PalestineT16T16T10T17T14T17T9T12T12---
16166馃嚠馃嚩 IraqT14T8T8T21T15T18T16T24T17---
17195馃嚛馃嚡 DjiboutiT13T14T12T25T18T21T20T23T14---
18208馃嚫馃嚲 SyriaT18T16T8T27T19T25T21T25T22---
19214馃嚤馃嚲 LibyaT17T12T9T26T21T26T18T26T21---
20216馃嚲馃嚜 YemenT21T18T10T31T22T27T20T25T23---

North America

North America's three nations represent a striking range of soft power capacity despite the region's small membership. The United States has long been regarded as the world's pre-eminent soft power, with unmatched global influence in higher education, media, cultural production and institutional design. Canada complements this with consistently strong governance quality, a well-regarded education system and a diplomatic brand built on multilateralism and openness. The region's soft capability is underpinned by deep institutional foundations, large research university systems and media ecosystems with genuinely global reach.

The rankings bear out this standing. The United States achieves T1 across all three soft domains, placing it at the very top of the global soft capability table alongside a handful of European and Asia-Pacific peers. Canada performs strongly, with T1 in human capital and near-frontier placements in information influence and governance integrity. Mexico, by contrast, sits considerably lower, with mid-tier scores across the soft domains that reflect ongoing challenges in educational outcomes, institutional trust and media environment quality. The gap between Mexico and its two northern neighbours is among the widest intra-regional disparities in any three-nation grouping, highlighting how proximity to soft power leaders does not automatically translate into shared capability levels.

Figure X. North America: 2026 Soft Capability Ratings

Soft Capability Hard Capability Soft Capability Econ Capability Frontiers
R#G#Nation CTSINS HCIIGI FSPITI T1T2T3
111馃嚭馃嚫 United StatesT1T1T1T3T1T7T1T1T17-1
222馃嚚馃嚘 CanadaT3T3T5T4T3T3T4T3T4--5
372馃嚙馃嚥 BermudaT8T9T7T10T7T10T9T10T12---

South Asia

South Asia is a region of vast demographic scale and deep intellectual traditions whose soft capability remains substantially below its potential. India, home to the world's largest population, possesses an enormous human capital base, a vibrant free press and a globally influential diaspora, yet its aggregate soft power performance is constrained by the sheer challenge of delivering education, governance quality and information infrastructure at continental scale. The region's other states range from Sri Lanka's relatively established institutional frameworks to Afghanistan's near-total collapse of soft capability, with Bangladesh, Nepal and Pakistan occupying various points along a spectrum defined more by aspiration than by achieved outcomes.

The soft capability data place every South Asian nation in the lower half of the global rankings, with India leading the region at G#48 but no state achieving T1 in any soft domain. Bhutan's comparatively strong governance integrity score and Bangladesh's progress in human capital development offer points of relative brightness, but the region as a whole faces deep structural challenges in translating its cultural and demographic weight into measurable soft power. Afghanistan's position near the bottom of the global table, with T26鈥揟30 scores across the soft domains, underscores the devastating effect of prolonged conflict on institutional and human capital. South Asia's soft power story is ultimately one of unrealised potential, where the ingredients for influence exist but the systems to harness them remain underdeveloped.

Figure X. South Asia: 2026 Soft Capability Ratings

Soft Capability Hard Capability Soft Capability Econ Capability Frontiers
R# G# Nation CT SI NS HC II GI FS PI TI F1 F2 F3
148馃嚠馃嚦 IndiaT5T5T4T9T5T11T6T7T8---
2101馃嚙馃嚛 BangladeshT11T10T8T13T9T15T11T16T13---
3103馃嚙馃嚬 BhutanT18T12T10T20T9T14T12T15T15---
4128馃嚤馃嚢 Sri LankaT11T11T9T14T12T16T14T17T14---
5141馃嚨馃嚢 PakistanT11T10T5T20T13T18T12T18T13---
6151馃嚦馃嚨 NepalT15T13T9T18T14T17T13T17T17---
7158馃嚥馃嚮 MaldivesT16T14T11T15T15T18T15T22T19---
8215馃嚘馃嚝 AfghanistanT21T19T14T30T22T26T21T27T25---

Sub Saharan Africa

Sub-Saharan Africa is the world's youngest and most rapidly growing region, with a soft power trajectory that is still in its early chapters. The region's cultural vibrancy, linguistic diversity and expanding youth populations represent significant latent soft capability, yet decades of underinvestment in education systems, weak institutional frameworks and governance deficits have left most states far from the global frontier. A small group of nations, notably Rwanda, Mauritius and Botswana, have pursued deliberate strategies of institutional reform and human capital investment that set them apart from their regional peers, while South Africa's established university sector and media ecosystem give it a distinctive profile among the continent's larger economies.

The rankings confirm Sub-Saharan Africa's position as the weakest region in global soft capability, but also reveal meaningful internal variation. Rwanda leads at G#55, a remarkable placement for a low-income state, driven primarily by its governance integrity and information influence scores. Mauritius and Botswana follow closely, both benefiting from small-state governance advantages and sustained investment in education. The long tail of the table, however, tells a harder story: nearly half the region's 48 nations rank below G#180, with Burundi, South Sudan and Sudan clustered near the bottom of the global table. No Sub-Saharan African state achieves T1 in any soft domain, and the region's median soft capability scores are the lowest of any World Bank grouping, reflecting systemic challenges that will require generational investment to overcome.

Figure X. Sub Saharan Africa: 2026 Soft Capability Ratings

Soft Capability Hard Capability Soft Capability Econ Capability Frontiers
R# G# Nation CT SI NS HC II GI FS PI TI F1 F2 F3
155馃嚪馃嚰 RwandaT14T7T8T10T6T7T10T13T12---
256馃嚥馃嚭 MauritiusT13T6T10T9T6T8T6T10T8---
358馃嚙馃嚰 BotswanaT14T7T9T11T6T8T7T14T13---
467馃嚳馃嚘 South AfricaT6T6T6T9T7T9T7T9T9---
575馃嚚馃嚮 Cabo VerdeT17T15T11T18T7T10T14T18T16---
676馃嚢馃嚜 KenyaT12T7T8T11T7T12T9T13T11---
778馃嚦馃嚞 NigeriaT12T10T6T14T7T13T10T14T12---
889馃嚞馃嚟 GhanaT13T9T8T14T8T10T10T14T12---
994馃嚫馃嚦 SenegalT13T11T8T16T8T13T10T16T13---
10111馃嚫馃嚚 SeychellesT14T13T10T11T13T12T14T18T17---
11119馃嚦馃嚘 NamibiaT13T10T9T17T14T11T12T15T14---
11119馃嚚馃嚠 C么te d'IvoireT14T7T9T17T11T14T9T15T12---
13123馃嚚馃嚞 Rep. of CongoT18T12T8T20T14T11T7T7T9---
14131馃嚚馃嚝 Central African Rep.T23T20T10T25T16T12T6T14T12---
15132馃嚬馃嚳 TanzaniaT14T11T10T19T12T17T13T19T14---
16133馃嚢馃嚥 ComorosT17T19T8T22T13T13T9T8T8---
17135馃嚞馃嚦 GuineaT19T15T9T20T15T13T12T8T13---
18137馃嚭馃嚞 UgandaT15T13T9T17T13T16T12T18T14---
19139馃嚜馃嚬 EthiopiaT12T12T9T19T13T17T16T19T14---
20147馃嚜馃嚪 EritreaT20T16T8T21T15T14T7T7T10---
21148馃嚥馃嚪 MauritaniaT13T12T8T22T14T16T11T14T13---
22155馃嚘馃嚧 AngolaT14T11T9T23T14T18T13T20T15---
23159馃嚳馃嚥 ZambiaT15T9T12T20T15T16T11T18T14---
24165馃嚚馃嚥 CameroonT15T13T9T20T15T18T13T17T14---
25166馃嚤馃嚫 LesothoT19T16T9T21T15T18T12T14T13---
25166馃嚥馃嚞 MadagascarT17T15T9T21T15T18T12T15T14---
27173馃嚳馃嚰 ZimbabweT15T14T11T22T15T20T16T21T16---
28176馃嚞馃嚥 GambiaT19T18T10T21T16T17T13T15T14---
29178馃嚥馃嚳 MozambiqueT16T12T11T24T16T18T15T22T15---
30180馃嚙馃嚡 BeninT18T14T12T23T16T19T14T21T16---
31181馃嚫馃嚤 Sierra LeoneT19T16T9T24T16T19T12T13T13---
32183馃嚫馃嚧 SomaliaT21T17T10T27T16T22T14T17T18---
33185馃嚞馃嚘 GabonT15T12T10T22T17T19T13T18T17---
34186馃嚥馃嚰 MalawiT17T15T10T23T17T19T16T20T18---
35187馃嚬馃嚞 TogoT17T14T10T24T17T19T14T19T15---
36188馃嚫馃嚳 EswatiniT16T15T11T22T17T20T17T21T16---
37189馃嚦馃嚜 NigerT20T18T10T23T17T20T12T12T13---
38191馃嚚馃嚛 DR CongoT18T15T9T24T17T20T15T19T16---
39196馃嚤馃嚪 LiberiaT20T17T11T26T18T21T17T24T19---
40198馃嚬馃嚛 ChadT22T19T8T24T18T22T19T19T16---
41199馃嚞馃嚩 Equatorial GuineaT19T13T11T25T18T22T17T23T19---
41199馃嚥馃嚤 MaliT19T16T11T25T18T22T14T22T18---
43204馃嚞馃嚰 Guinea-BissauT22T20T10T29T19T21T12T18T17---
44205馃嚫馃嚬 S茫o Tom茅 & Pr铆ncipeT22T20T13T27T19T22T19T25T22---
45206馃嚙馃嚝 Burkina FasoT19T17T12T25T19T24T14T23T20---
46207馃嚫馃嚛 SudanT17T15T9T26T19T24T18T23T20---
47210馃嚫馃嚫 South SudanT24T20T9T30T20T22T16T17T15---
48213馃嚙馃嚠 BurundiT21T19T13T27T21T24T20T24T20---