Summer Internship in International Affairs. Geoeconomics, Technology & Security Analyst
A 10‑week, project‑based program where small teams assess three countries across the nine areas of national capability. You’ll combine top‑down hypotheses with bottom‑up indicators, stress‑test your claims through red‑teaming, and deliver a defended assessment to expert judges.

XXX
Global Institute of National Capability (GINC)
Format: Remote (10 Weeks) · Team‑based · AI Skills · Slack‑first collaboration
Focus: Comparative national capability across nine areas (Critical Technology, Strategic Infrastructure, National Security, Human Capital, Information & Influence, Governance & Integrity, Financial Strength, Production & Innovation, Investment & Trade)
Outcome: One professional, defendable assessment per team; LinkedIn‑verifiable GINC badge; top teams invited to regional roundtables
What this internship is
A 10‑week, project‑based program where small teams assess three countries across the nine areas of national capability. You’ll combine top‑down hypotheses with bottom‑up indicators, stress‑test your claims through red‑teaming, and deliver a defended assessment to expert judges.
You will leave with:
- A publishable‑quality country capability dossier and defense deck
- Hands‑on practice using AI as a research copilot (with rigorous human verification)
- A GINC Summer Analyst digital badge for LinkedIn (with optional “Merit/Distinction” notations)
- Eligibility for regional roundtable invitations
How it works
- Teams & Slack: You’ll collaborate in dedicated Slack channels, with weekly live sessions (webinars, clinics), and async threads for research, data, and feedback.
- Single integrated project: One shared product per team (executive brief, full assessment, indicator workbook, argument maps, slides) defended in Week 10.
- AI throughout, with guardrails: We use approved GenAI tools for brainstorming, literature triage, synthesis, argument mapping, scenario ideation, and meeting summarization—never as a substitute for evidence. All claims require sources; teams document AI prompts/outputs in an AI log and verify facts before inclusion.
- Time commitment: Designed for a serious summer load (recommendation: ~20–30 hours/week, combining live and async work).
- Support: Weekly office hours (Ask‑Me‑Anything), data help threads, and red‑team coaching.
Weekly guide (with AI usage highlighted)
Week 1 — Onboarding & Intro to National Capability
Live welcome + Q&A; overview of the framework; materials shared; collect country preferences.
AI this week: orientation to GINC’s AI guardrails; quick demo on prompt hygiene and citation discipline.
Deliverables: Team charter; scope statement; Slack setup.
Week 2 — Project Design & Data Architecture
Teams announced; project outline and step‑by‑step process; teams create channels and approach; GenAI demo for brainstorming, idea capture, and research triage; start argument maps.
AI this week: ideation, literature surfacing, preliminary source scans, structured argument‑map building.
Deliverables: Methods memo v1; data/source registry; initial argument map.
Week 3 — Evaluation Framework Build
Training on rubrics and the GINC evaluation rubric; craft top‑down hypotheses for all nine areas; produce hypotheses for each of the three countries. Session on AI‑supported evaluations and how to red‑team them.
AI this week: draft comparative rubrics, generate hypothesis “strawmen,” and run AI‑assisted red‑team prompts to expose gaps—then verify manually.
Deliverables: Framework v1; nine‑area hypotheses per country; AI log entries with verification notes.
Week 4 — Hard Capability Analysis
Three webinars: Critical Technology, Strategic Infrastructure, National Security. Teams run bottom‑up assessments and share internally.
AI this week: indicator extraction checklists, evidence synthesis, outline drafting; caution flags for hallucinations.
Deliverables: Hard‑capability sections + cited indicators.
Week 5 — Soft Capability Analysis
Three webinars: Human Capital, Information & Influence, Governance & Integrity. Continue bottom‑up work.
AI this week: sentiment/topic clustering for media/governance sources, policy‑document summarization, bias checks.
Deliverables: Soft‑capability sections + methods notes.
Week 6 — Economic & Financial Capability
Three webinars: Financial Strength, Production & Innovation, Investment & Trade.
AI this week: table/figure drafting, sensitivity‑analysis scaffolds, cross‑country comparator generation (manually validated).
Deliverables: Econ/financial sections + sensitivity tables.
Week 7 — Synthesis & First Full Draft Submission
Integration clinic and last‑mile tips; submit full bottom‑up evaluation at the most granular level by week’s end.
AI this week: narrative smoothing, duplication checks, terminology harmonization, figure/slide drafts.
Deliverables: Full Draft v1 (report + workbook + slides).
Week 8 — Red‑Team Round
Each team is assigned another team’s draft to red‑team. Conduct a 30‑minute feedback webinar; the session is AI‑summarized and posted async.
AI this week: structured critique prompts (assumptions/data/logic), meeting auto‑summaries with action items.
Deliverables: Red‑team memo + AI summary; response plan.
Week 9 — Adjustment Week
Incorporate feedback; resolve challenges to assumptions/data; finalize evaluation in GINC template.
AI this week: change‑tracking, consistency checks, executive‑summary drafting (human‑edited), reference cross‑checks.
Deliverables: Final submission package (report, workbook, argument maps, slides).
Week 10 — Oral Presentation & Defense
60‑minute presentations + Q&A; judges push on method, evidence, and implications.
AI this week: speaker notes rehearsal, Q&A bank generation, timing practice.
Deliverables: Approved final package; GINC badge issued; roundtable selections announced.
What you’ll build (deliverables)
- Executive brief (1–2 pages) and defense deck
- Full comparative assessment across nine areas for three countries
- Indicator workbook with sources, transformations, and limitations
- Argument maps linking claims → evidence → assumptions → risks
- AI log documenting prompts, outputs kept/discarded, and human verification
Why you should apply
- Real‑world relevance: Geoeconomics, technology, and security are converging—this program sits at that intersection.
- Method + evidence, not buzzwords: You’ll learn how to build defensible frameworks, not just summaries.
- AI fluency with rigor: Use AI to go faster and raise quality—within a professional verification workflow.
- Career signal: A recognisable GINC badge plus a portfolio piece you can show to employers.
- Network & visibility: Feedback from practitioners; top teams invited to GINC regional roundtables.
Assessment & recognition
- Scoring: Methodological rigor (30%), Evidence quality (25%), Insight & relevance (25%), Communication (10%), Teamwork (10%).
- Badging: GINC Summer Analyst (2025); distinctions for top performers (Merit, Distinction).
- Roundtables: Selections consider composite score and topic diversity.
Eligibility & expectations
- Advanced undergraduates, master’s, and early‑career professionals in IR/IA, economics, public policy, data/CS, security studies, area studies, or adjacent fields.
- Comfort with evidence synthesis and collaborative writing. Prior coding is a plus but not required.
- Workload: Plan ~20–30 hrs/week across live sessions and async teamwork.
Responsible AI & data policy
- Cite everything. No AI‑generated claims without sources.
- No confidential or personal data in prompts.
- Human‑in‑the‑loop: Every AI‑assisted output is reviewed and, if used, edited by humans.
- Transparency: Maintain your AI log; be ready to show it during defense.
Ready to level up?
Join a focused cohort, learn to think like an analyst, and graduate with a defensible, portfolio‑ready assessment—and the GINC credential to back it up.